- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8886 RP No. 100086 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 100086 OF 2023 BETWEEN: JUMMA MASJID, REPRESENTED BY ITS MUTWALLI, BAD, TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD-580018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED R.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD-580001. 3. KARNATAKA BOARD OF WAKFS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALURU-560052. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD-580001. 5. NASEER KHAN, S/O. DADULLA KHAN DASANKOPPA, MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.07.26 11:09:17 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8886 RP No. 100086 of 2023 AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURER, R/O. BAAD, TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD-580118. 6. SALEEM KHAN, S/O. DADULLA KHAN DASANKOPPA, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BAAD GRAMA, TQ: DHARWAD-580118. 7. RASHEEDA BANU, W/O. MOINUDDIN TAMBOLI AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, BAAD GRAMA, TQ: DHARWAD-580118. 8. AYUB KHAN, S/O. DADULLA KHAN DASANKOPPA, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICLUTURE, BAAD GRAMA, TQ: DHARWAD-580118. 9. JAKEER KHAN, S/O. DADULLA KHAN DASANKOPPA, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, BAAD GRAMA, TQ: DHARWAD-580118. 10. GOUSE KHAN, S/O. DADULLA KHAN DASANKOPPA, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, BAAD GRAMA, TQ: DHARWAD-580118. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IN WP NO.108623/2018 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER XLVII RULE (1) OF CPC PRAYING TO CALL THE RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP NO.108623/2018 (KLR-RES) PASSED BY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8886 RP No. 100086 of 2023 SINGLE JUDGE ON 27.01.2022; TO REVIEW THE ORDER PASSED IN WP NO.108623/2018 (KLR-RES) BY SINGLE JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH, DHARWAD ON 27.01.2022 AS PER ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE COURT, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH, DHARWAD IN WA NO.100070/2023 PASSED ON 19.09.2023 AND ETC. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ) The petitioner has sought review of the order dated 27.01.2022 passed by this Court in W.P. No.108623/2018. 2. The petitioner contends that though it was party in the writ petition, the advocate, who had undertaken to appear on behalf of it, did not intimate it. It is also contended that the petitioner has challenged the grant of occupancy rights to the predecessors of respondents No.5 to 10 before this Court in W.P. No.100575/2023. It is therefore, contended that the order passed by this Court dated 27.01.2022 be reviewed and recalled. 3. A perusal of the order dated 27.01.2022 shows that there is no error apparent on the face of record - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8886 RP No. 100086 of 2023 warranting interference. Hence, the review petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner succeeds in W.P. No.100575/2023, it would invariably alter the revenue records that stand in the name of respondents No.5 to 10. Sd/- (R.NATARAJ) JUDGE KMS Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3