Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8486 (MAD)

PARITHA v. SIA CARRIERS LLP

CMP/29639/2025 · 2026-07-20

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.29639 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.186382 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 301 days in preferring the above appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Notice to first respondent is dispensed with since the first respondent remained ex parte before the Tribunal. 4. Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel, takes notice for second respondent. 5. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 301 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned. 6. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission in due course. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel for second respondent at the time of admission. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for interest for the delay period in the event of enhancement of compensation. 20.07.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis