Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8484 (RAJ)

SURENDRA SINGH RAJAWAT SON OF UDAI SINGH RAJAWAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WRES/195/2024 · 2025-03-25

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13465] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Restoration Application No. 195/2024 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2656/2008 Surendra Singh Rajawat Son Of Udai Singh Rajawat, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 4, Jawahar Sadan, Dahar Ka Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Land Acquisition Officer, Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Jahawar Lal Nehru Marg, Indira Circle, Jaipur. 3. The Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Jahawarlal Nehru Marg, Indira Circle, Jaipur. 4. Shri Mahendra Soni, Additional Commissioner (Land), The Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Jahawarlal Nehru Marg, Indira Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/03/2025 1. Instant restoration application has been filed, seeking restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2656/2008, which came to be dismissed due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 19.01.2024. [2025:RJ-JP:13465] (2 of 2) [WRES-195/2024] 2. Counsel for applicant states that due to bona fide error, instead of submitting notices of respondent No.2, notices for respondent No.4 were filed, however, he undertakes to file requisite PF and notices of unserved respondents soon after restoration of the writ petition. 3. Taking into consideration reasons mentioned in the application and undertaking of counsel for applicant to file PF and notices, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application, subject to deposition of cost. 4. Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2656/2008 is allowed to be restored to its original number, subject to condition of deposition of a cost of Rs.1,000/- with the Litigants Welfare Fund through Banker’s Cheque/ DD in the name of Registrar General LWFA, Rajasthan High Court within a period of four weeks. Receipt of deposition of cost amount be placed in the file. However, in case of non- deposition of cost amount within the stipulated time period, as directed hereinabove, the restoration application be treated as dismissed. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /42