Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84825 (PNJ)

SITAR KHAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/21673/2025 · 2025-07-30

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 121 Sitar Khan State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioner as per the rules, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and 15896-2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA 2024 has also been dismissed on 10.12.2024. Re in the present petition has been submitted, which has counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. K.K.Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Paras Khindri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioner as per the rules, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and 2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA 2024 has also been dismissed on 10.12.2024. Re in the present petition, an application dated 06.02.2025, Annexure P has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21673-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 30.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents ICE AMAN CHAUDHARY . K.K.Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioner as per the rules, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and another, CWP- 2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA-2977- 2024 has also been dismissed on 10.12.2024. Regarding the claim raised n application dated 06.02.2025, Annexure P-13, yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-21673-2025 -2- 2. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the application dated 06.02.2025, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 30.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.