KAILASH GURJAR S/O SH. DUDHAR GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2795/2025 · 2025-06-06
Mukesh Rajpurohit V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8482 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8482 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2795/2025 Kailash Gurjar S/o Sh. Dudhar Gurjar, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Rampura Ki Dhani, Sargaon, Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, G.A.-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)
Order 06/06/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.320/2023 registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that he is only witness to the Power of Attorney which was used for transfer of property. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that offence(s) are triable by the Magistrate and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
[2025:RJ-JP:22941] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2795/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and counsel for the complainant has opposed the bail application.
4. I have considered the contention made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with regard to facts and circumstances of the case. The offence(s) of the petitioner are triable by the Magistrate and petitioner is in judicial custody since
05.02.2025.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Kailash Gurjar S/o Sh. Dudhar Gurjar is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J Chandan/AVG/13