Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84819 (PNJ)

AVTAR SINGH v. GURDEV SINGH AND ORS

RFA/525/2014 · 2025-05-15

Anil Kshetarpal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-525-2014(O&M) RFA-526-2014 (O&M) 1 110-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. RFA-525-2014(O&M) Avtar Singh (since deceased) through his LRs ..Appellant Versus Gurdev Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and others ..Respondents 2. RFA-526-2014(O&M) Avtar Singh (since deceased) through his LRs ..Appellant Versus Gurdev Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and others ..Respondents Date of decision:15.05.2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Rajiv Dhiman, Advocate and Mr. S.N.Kandpal, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Hardip Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 1 and 2 Mr. Jaivir S Chandail, Addl. Standing Counsel for UT, Chd-respondent no.3 ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral) 1. With the consent of the Learned counsel representing the parties, two RFA-525 and 526 of 2014 shall stand disposed of by this common order. 2. A common reference petition under Sections 18 and 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was decided by the Reference Court. Rekha Sihag 2025.05.22 02:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh RFA-525-2014(O&M) RFA-526-2014 (O&M) 2 There was a dispute with regard apportionment of the compensation. Now, the learned counsel representing the parties submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the dispute with regard to apportionment stands amicably settled. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, which is taken on record as mark ‘C-I’, learned counsel representing the appellants, private respondents as well as UT, Chandigarh pray for disposal of the question with regard to market value of the acquired land in terms of RFA-2680-2012 titled as ‘Ishar Singh vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh’ decided on 11.02.2019. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. The deed of settlement shall be attached as annexure with this order 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 15.05.2025 JUDGE rekha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Rekha Sihag 2025.05.22 02:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh