Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84797 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8187/2025 · 2025-07-31

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8187 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 109 Bhupinder Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent no. protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who the behest of respondent nos. consider and 2. private respondents are not returning the money which they had usurped from the petitioner and his clients in the name of providing VISA and on hand, they are continuously harassing and extending threats to the petitioner. is submitted that having no other option, the petitioner had filed representation dated 09.07.2025 (Annexure P been taken so far by him. 3. 8187-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhupinder Singh Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Charitr Kadyan, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent no. protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who the behest of respondent nos.5 to 8 and also to direct respondent no.2 to consider and take action on his representation dated Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that private respondents are not returning the money which they had usurped from the petitioner and his clients in the name of providing VISA and on hand, they are continuously harassing and extending threats to the petitioner. is submitted that having no other option, the petitioner had filed representation .07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no. n taken so far by him. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8187-2025 Decided on:31.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioner has filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent no.2 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who is apprehending danger at and also to direct respondent no.2 to n on his representation dated 09.07.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on one hand the private respondents are not returning the money which they had usurped from the petitioner and his clients in the name of providing VISA and on the other hand, they are continuously harassing and extending threats to the petitioner. is submitted that having no other option, the petitioner had filed representation ) to respondent no.3 but no positive action has Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioner ...Respondents /227 for apprehending danger at and also to direct respondent no.2 to on one hand the private respondents are not returning the money which they had usurped from the other hand, they are continuously harassing and extending threats to the petitioner. It is submitted that having no other option, the petitioner had filed representation but no positive action has VINOD KUMAR 2025.08.01 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8187 4. respondent-State and prays for time to have instructions. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no. Amritsar to decide grant protecti 6. the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. July 31, 2025 vinod* 8187-2025 Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and prays for time to have instructions. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluat value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.3- Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, District to decide the representation (Annexure P grant protection to him, if any threat to his life It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and prays for time to have instructions. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, District the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner and his life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the e the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, District ) of the petitioner and It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. VINOD KUMAR 2025.08.01 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document