MR BIKASH HARI JAMATI @ BIKASH HARI JAMATIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./635/2025 · 2025-06-08
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8477 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8477 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010043682025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./635/2025 MR BIKASH HARI JAMATI @ BIKASH HARI JAMATIA S/O BRINDABAN JAMATIA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MOHARPARA P.O- NORTH PULINPUR , P.S- TELIAMURA, DISTRICT-WEST TRIPURA , TELIAMUR , KHOWAI TRIPURA. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K K KALITA, MR. K UDDIN,T M LAHKAR,MS. G DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER Date : 09.06.2025 Heard Ms. G Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. This is an application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023, whereby, the petitioner, Mr. Bikash Hari Jamati @ Bikash Hari Jamatia has prayed for releasing him on bail as he is facing trial in NDPS Case No. 07/2023 pending in the Court of Ld.
Page No.# 2/2 Additional Sessions Judge No. 5, Kamrup(M), Guwahati. I have gone through the scanned copy of the L.C.R. Out of the 6(six) prosecution witnesses, 5(five) have been examined and 1(one) is yet to be examined. Ms. G Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed that the petitioner has been in custody for the last 2 years 11 months. According to Ms. G Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, the period of incarceration may be taken up as a ground for releasing him on bail. Mr. M.P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam has pointed out that only 1(one) witness is yet to be examined and the trial is about to be complete. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the sides. Only 1(one) witness is yet to be examined by the Trial Court. Therefore, at this stage, allowing the petitioner on bail would amount to delay in disposal of the case before the Trial Court. Hence, the present Bail Application has not been considered today. The Trial Court is directed to expeditiously dispose of the case within a short period of time. With the aforesaid direction, the present Bail Application stands closed and
disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant