- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4255 WP No. 103967 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 103967 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. BHARAMAPPA S/O. MALLAPPA ANAJI, AGE: 81 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O BATTIKOPPA, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI – 581 111. 2. RAMAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA ANAJI, AGE 76 YEARS, OCC.NIL, R/O BATTIKOPPA, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI – 581 111. 3. SMT. SUSHEELAVVA W/O SHIVAPPA ANAJI, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O BATTIKOPPA, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI - 581 111. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AVINASH BANAKAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SIDDAPPA S/O. BHARAMAPPA ANAJI, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O BATTIKOPPA, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI – 581 111. 2. MALATESH S/O MAHADEVRAO INAMDAR, AGE 69 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK, R/O CHITAGUPPI PARK, PINTO ROAD, HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 004. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4255 WP No. 103967 of 2021 3. SMT. MALATI W/O MAHADEVRAO DESHPANDE, AGE 73 YEARS, OCC. RTD EMPLOYEE, R/O KESHWAPUR, UDAYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-5800 04. 4. SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O ANANT JOSHI, AGE 71 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O BEHIND LAMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL, HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 004. 5. SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O BISHTESH NADIGER, AGE 66 YEARS, OCC. RTD TEACHER, R/O S.S.K. NAGAR, DAVANAGERE, TQ AND DIST. DAVANAGERE 561 120. 6. SMT. VIDYAVATI W/O MADWESH GADDANAKERI, AGE 60 YEARS, OCC. RTD GOVT EMPLOYEE, R/O LAMINGTON PALACE CLUB ROAD, HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.G.KADADAKATTI., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 & 6-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Avinash Banakar., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.S.G.Kadadakatti., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4255 WP No. 103967 of 2021 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62