- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17470 WP No. 107989 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107989 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MANJUNATH S/O. TIRAKAPPA MALAGI AGE ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOUSE NUMBER 19/5, 4TH CROSS, SHAKTIPITH NAGAR, UNKAL-LAKE VIEW VIDYANAGAR, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580025. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR B. HALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MALLIKARJUN S/O. TIRAKAPPA MALAGI AGE ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOUSE NUMBER 19/5, 4TH CROSS, SHAKTIPITH NAGAR, UNKAL-LAKE VIEW VIDYANAGAR, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD. 2. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF THE ADLR SURVEY HUBBALLI-DHARWAD HUBBALLI OFFICE, DHARWAD DISTRICT-580020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.V. PATTAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R2; SRI. ASHOK C. ANGADI, FOR PROPOSED APPLICANT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ENDORSEMENT BEARING NUMBER DATED. 01-08-2025, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Date: 2025.12.09 11:55:14 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17470 WP No. 107989 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he would seek to withdraw the petition. He has filed a memo to that effect. Memo reads as follows: “It is submitted that the present petitioner filed this writ petition without submitting the certain documents. The petitioner recently obtained some documents concerned to his rights. Now it is very much necessary to produce those documents before this Hon’ble Court for complete adjudication of the rights of the petitioner and respondent. Therefore, this Hon’ble Court is pleased permit the petitioner to withdraw the above mentioned writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition on same cause of action in the interest of justice and equity.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not press the sentences in the memo that seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. Therefore, it is a withdrawal simpliciter. In that light, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE Rsh / CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28