HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 1138 of 2025 Daleep Singh ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mohd. Shafy, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.173 of 2023, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the main accused has already been granted bail; the role of the applicant is lesser than that of the main accused. 4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 02.07.2025 Ravi Bisht