RAM NARAYAN VERMA ND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/3211/2025 · 2025-07-10
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110882 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3211 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Narayan Verma Nd 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.B. Singh,Ram Pyare Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashok Kumar Chaudhary,G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the entire proceeding as well as charge sheet dated 28.07.2024 and summoning order dated 09.10.2024 in Special S.T. Criminal Case No. 1335 of 2024 (State Versus Ram Narayan and others), arising out Case Crime NO. 156 of 2024 under Sections 452,323,325, 504,506 I.P.C. and 3(1) (d) 3(1) (dh), 3(2) (va) of Schedule Caste / Schedule Tribes (Atrocities Prevention) Act, Police Station-Parasrampur, District-Basti, pending in the court of Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Basti. 3. As per the FIR version, on the date of incident, i.e. 10.6.2024 at about 2:30 P.M., all the accused, with common intention came at the doorstep of the first informant and badly beat him up and his son as well as hurled caste related abusive language. Perusal of the record evinces that the first informant has sustained grievous injuries wherein his left forearm has fractured. Likewise, his son has also sustained grievous injuries wherein his left foot has fractured. 4. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the applicants chose not to press the instant application on merits. However, he has urged for interim protection to the present applicants so that they may appear before the court below and participate in the court proceedings. It is submitted that present applicants are ready and willing to appear before the court below to cooperate in the trial. They have never intended to ignore the court proceedings. As such, some protection may be granted. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case protection is granted to the present applicants to enable them to appear before the court below to participate in the court proceedings. 6.
In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose off the present application, without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the present application, with a direction that in case present applicants appear/surrender and move bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today, same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 7. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicants in aforesaid criminal case. Order Date :- 11.7.2025/vkg Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad