ADESH SHARMA @ AADESH SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2275/2025 · 2025-07-25
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8473 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8473 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:20492
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2275 of 2025
Adesh Sharma @ Aadesh Sharma aged about 33 years S/O Girand Pal Sharma @ Girand Pal, Resident of Agra Road, Chitragupta colony, P.O. & P.S. City Kotwali, District- Etah (U.P.)
….........Petitioner
Vrs.
The State of Jharkhand
.......... Opposite Party
…....
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P..
05/25.07.2025 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 25.07.2023, has renewed the prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 32 of 2023, arising out Charhi P.S. Case No. 66 of 2018 for the offence registered under Sections 20,22 & 23 of the NDPS Act, pending in the court of learned A.D.J.-I, Hazaribag.
3. The prayer for regular bail of this applicant has been rejected vide
order dated 12.12.2023 in B.A. No. 9848 of 2023 and vide order dated 14.05.2024 in B.A. No. 713 of 2024. This is applicant’s third attempt for grant of regular bail.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that complete set of F.I.R along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. It has been informed by him that the case is at the stage of argument.
6. Considering the stage of the trial, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty