Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212 FAO-677-2018
Decided on:25.04.2025 Geeta Devi and others . . . Appellants Versus Nirmal Singh @ Nimma and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL PRESENT: None for the appellants. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1. None had appeared on behalf of the appellants on the last 3 dates.
2. Even today, none has appeared on behalf of the appellants to inform the Court as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal.
3. In view of the above, present appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
4. Liberty is granted to the appellants to revive the appeal, in case, any cause of action survives.
5. Registry is directed to send the copy of the present order to the appellants on the address mentioned in the memo of parties.
(VIKAS BAHL) 25.04.2025
JUDGE Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2025.04.25 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment