IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.51 of 2025 Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar Gupta …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Sakshi Thakur, Proxy counsel for Mr. D.S.Nainta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 14.07.2025, issued under the signatures of Registrar, HPPWD, Nigam Vihar, Shimla, learned Additional Advocate General states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, respondents, after having considered the claim of the petitioner, have prepared the calculations in respect of the claim of the petitioner and will be submitting necessary bills, on account of calculations, to the Treasury very shortly, subject to legal remedies available to the respondents. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed with a 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 direction to the respondents to ensure that bills, in respect of the claim of the petitioner, are submitted to the Treasury within a period of ten days and thereafter, payment shall be made to the petitioner within a period of one week, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 14, 2025 (sunil)