Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84716 (PNJ)

STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR v. LACHHMAN DASS

RFA/5094/2014 · 2025-07-25

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA State of Punjab and Lachhman Dass CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) No. 6957 of 2013 July 25, 2025 'Sumit Gusain' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cross State of Punjab and others Vs. Lachhman Dass CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/landowners/ X-objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. (in RFA-10437-2014). **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in No. 6957 of 2013 titled “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others” July 25, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA) 'Sumit Gusain' Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFANo. 5094-2014 (O&M) with Cross-objections No. 261-CI-2016 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 .......... Appellants .......... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/landowners/ objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in RFA “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others”. ( HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2014 (O&M) with 2016 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 .......... Appellants Respondent RFA . SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.08.05 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document