SUBASH CHANDER v. SANTOSH D VAIDYA, COMMISSIONER JAMMUMUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER
CCP(S)/331/2025 · 2026-05-06
Rahul Bharti
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 847 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 847 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 2 CCP(S) No. 331/2025 in SWP No. 1715/2018
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Pronounced on : 06.05.2026 Uploaded on : 13.05.2026
CCP(S) No. 331/2025 in SWP No. 1715/2018
Subash Chander
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate
Vs
Santosh D. Vaidya & Anr.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Mayank Gupta, Standing Counsel for R-1
Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-2
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (06.05.2026)
01. This contempt petition originated by reference to an order dated 02.05.2025 passed by this Court in terms whereof SWP No. 1715/2018 came to be accorded disposal along with SWP No. 1717/2018.
02. The end result of the adjudication was quashment of impugned order issued by the Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit & Pensions, Jammu, with a consequent direction unto the writ respondents to release the entire Serial No. 12 Regular List
Page 2 of 2 CCP(S) No. 331/2025 in SWP No. 1715/2018
retiral benefits in favour of the petitioners along with interest @ 7.5% from the date of withholding of the retiral benefits till the date of its actual payment.
03. As the needful was not carried in compliance, the petitioner came forward with the present contempt petition instituted on 27.09.2025.
04. Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the compliance has been carried out and, as such, the present contempt petition is rendered infructuous which is accordingly, disposed of and be consigned to records.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
06.05.2026
SUNIL
Whether the order is speaking ? : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable ? : Yes/No