IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 101 Simran Agro Mills State of Punjab and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to reconsider and allow the petitioner's application for de novo registration under the Punjab Custom Milling Policy for Kharif Marketing Se and to grant such registration in accordance with law, the applicable policy provisions and the principles of natural justice within a stipulated period, thereby enabling the petitioner to participate in the custom milling operations for the c Further prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order/decision uploaded on the (Annexure P CWP-31982-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.31982 of 2025 Date of decision : Simran Agro Mills Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sauman Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to reconsider and allow the petitioner's application for de novo registration under the Punjab Custom Milling Policy for Kharif Marketing Se and to grant such registration in accordance with law, the applicable policy provisions and the principles of natural justice within a stipulated period, thereby enabling the petitioner to participate in the custom milling operations for the concerned marketing season Further prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order/decision uploaded on the (Annexure P-6), whereby the petitioner's application for de novo 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 31982 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-27.07.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sauman Singh Gill, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to reconsider and allow the petitioner's application for de novo registration under the Punjab Custom Milling Policy for Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26 and to grant such registration in accordance with law, the applicable policy provisions and the principles of natural justice within a stipulated period, thereby enabling the petitioner to participate in the oncerned marketing season. Further prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order/decision uploaded on the anaajkharid.in portal 6), whereby the petitioner's application for de novo VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.28 19.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document registration was rejected 21.10.2025 (Annexure P statutory appeal dated 16.10.2025 (Annexure P the impugned orders are arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of the principles o applicable policy and unsustainable in law, despite the petitioner having fulfilled all the prescribed eligibility conditions and procedural requirements. inclined to prays for wit recourse to appropriate rem July 27, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CWP-31982-2025 (O & M) registration was rejected, as well as the appellate order dated 21.10.2025 (Annexure P-9) passed by respondent No.1 dismissing the statutory appeal dated 16.10.2025 (Annexure P the impugned orders are arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of the principles of natural justice, contrary to the provisions of the applicable policy and unsustainable in law, despite the petitioner having fulfilled all the prescribed eligibility conditions and procedural requirements. After arguing for some time, when this Court w inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedy available to him as per law Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 , as well as the appellate order dated 9) passed by respondent No.1 dismissing the statutory appeal dated 16.10.2025 (Annexure P-8), on the grounds that the impugned orders are arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of the f natural justice, contrary to the provisions of the applicable policy and unsustainable in law, despite the petitioner having fulfilled all the prescribed eligibility conditions and procedural After arguing for some time, when this Court was not , learned counsel for the petitioner hdrawal of the present petition with liberty to take edy available to him as per law, if any. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.28 19.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document