Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84686 (ALL)

RAVINDRA AND 30 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/27001/2025 · 2025-08-11

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136268-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27001 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravindra And 30 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar,Vikrant Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh,Sunil Kumar Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard Mr. Vikrant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. K.N. Singh, learned counsel for the Development-Authority, Mr. F.A. Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents, Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 and perused the material brought on the record. 2. After substantial arguments, once the Court has declined to entertain the instant petition precisely keeping in view of the fact that revision against the cancellation of lease is pending for consideration before the revisional authority, Mr. Vikrant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly conceded the fact that he does not want to press the instant petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. However, leave may be accorded to the petitioners to press the relief in the ongoing proceeding before the revisional authority. 3. Learned counsel for the contesting-respondents are having no objection to the same. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad