ANIL SHAMRAO MANE DIED LRS SANGITA AND ORS v. PADMINBAI ALIAS FULABAI MURLIDHAR JADHAV AND OTHERS
CA/1728/2025 · 2025-03-05
Shri Rohit W Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8468 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8468 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 1728.2025CA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1727 OF 2025 IN SA/50/2016 ANIL SHAMRAO MANE DIED LRS SANGITA AND ORS VERSUS PADMINBAI ALIAS FULABAI MURLIDHAR JADHAV L.RS. VATSALLA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Surve Hemant S. Advocate for Respondents : Mr.Shrikant G. Kawade ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1729 OF 2025 IN SA/50/2016 ANIL SHAMRAO MANE DIED LRS SANGITA AND ORS VERSUS PADMINBAI ALIAS FULABAI MURLIDHAR JADHAV L.RS. VATSALLA AND OTHERS ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1728 OF 2025 IN SA/50/2016 ANIL SHAMRAO MANE DIED LRS SANGITA AND ORS VERSUS PADMINBAI ALIAS FULABAI MURLIDHAR JADHAV AND OTHERS ... WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2016 ANIL SHAMRAO MANE DIED LRSSANGITA AND ORS VERSUS PADMINBAI MURLIDHAR JADHAV ….. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. Dated : 5th MARCH, 2025 2025:BHC-AUG:6730
2 1728.2025CA PER COURT :- Civil Application No.1728/2025 :-
1. The appellant no.2 has expired. The legal representatives have moved the present application for bringing their names on record in place of deceased appellant no.2. There is delay of 134 days in filing the application.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which are not controverted by the respondent by filing reply, I am inclined to condone the delay. The delay is accordingly condoned and permission is granted to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellant no.2 on record. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks.
3. The civil application stands disposed of. Civil Application No. 1729/2025 :- Heard.
2. Issue notice to the proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent, returnable on 26th March, 2025.
3. The applicant is permitted to serve the proposed legal representatives of respondent by registered post and all permissible modes of private service, in addition to the regular mode of service.
( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J ) sga/2025