APHC010091512022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 461/2022 Between: 1. REDNAM BHEEMESWARA RAO,, S/O SUBBA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 2. REDNAM SATYAVATHI,, W/O BHEEMESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED 30 YEARS. 3. REDNAM SESHAGIRI RAO, , S/O SUBBA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 4. REDNAM RATNAM KUMARI,, W/O SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O D.NO. 12-1-36, SINGH HOTEL JUNCTION, NEAR JUDGE COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RADHA KRISHNAMMA PUPPALA, W/O. LATE P.V.REDDY NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 2. SAI PERUMALLA RAVINDRA PUPPALA, S/O LATE P.V.REDDY NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 3. SOBHA PUPPALA, D/O LATE P.V.REDDY NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 4. PUPPALA MADHAVA, D/O LATE P.V.REDDY NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. RESPONDENT NOS 1 TO 4 ARE R/O D.NO. 47-10-30, DWARAKA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530016. 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.461 of 2022 5. REDNAM VIJAY KUMAR, S/O BHEEMESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 6. REDNAM VIJAYA LAKSHMI, D/O BHEEMESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 7. T NAGAMANI, , W/O NOT,KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 8. T SURESH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 9. POTHULA PRABHAVATHI, , D/O SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 10. REDNAM VASANTA, D/O SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 11. REDNAM LNDUVENI, D/O SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS 5 TO 11 ARE R/O D.NO. 12-1-36, SINGH HOTEL JUNCTION, NEAR JUDGE COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 28.12.2021 passed in I.A.No. 360 of 2021 in O.S. No. 709 of 2016, on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge - cum II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in IA.No.360 of 2021 in OS.No.709 of 2016 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam - cum - II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of main CRP in the interest of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M/s INNATE LAW ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.461 of 2022 The Court made the following order: No representation for the petitioners. 2. As can be seen from the E-Courts of the District Judiciary, the main suit in O.S.No.709 of 2016 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, was disposed of by judgment dated 30.06.2022. 3. In view of the same, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 17.07.2025 KGR