Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84679 (ALL)

SUNITA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11463/2025 · 2025-08-10

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135043 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11463 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunita Devi Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Yadav,Shashank Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the Respondent No.3/ District Inspector of Schools, Varanasi to appoint the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (Arts) according to her qualification under the U.P. dying in Harness Rules 1976 in accordance with law as early as possible within a period as stipulated by this Hon'ble court; (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the Petitioner's Application dated 25.06.2024 (Annexure no.6 to the writ petition) by a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court;" 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. The petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3, District Inspector of Schools, Varanasi within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad