Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84670 (KAR)

SMT SUJATA W/O RAMESH SHINDE v. SRI RAMESH S/O BAJURAV SHINDE

CRP/100147/2025 · 2025-12-11

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18035 CRP No. 100147 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 100147 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. SUJATA W/O RAMESH SHINDE, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. TYPIST IN JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, R/O. WARD NO.5, JANATA PLOT, MUDHOL-587 313, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALAKOTE. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHETAN T. LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. RAMESH S/O BAJURAV SHINDE, AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. VIJAYAPURA, NOW AT: SAVALAGI VILLAGE, TQ. JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOTE. … RESPONDENT THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS; SET ASIDE THE ORDER, DATED 12.09.2025 PASSED BY ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JAMAKHANDI IN M.C. NO.16/2025 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION I.A. NO.1 FILED BY THE PRESENT PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(D) CPC., TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2025.12.16 11:21:18 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18035 CRP No. 100147 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) This petition is filed assailing the order dated 12.09.2025 passed by Additional Senior Civil Judge, Jamakhandi in M.C. No.16/2025 on I.A. No.1 rejecting the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure (‘Code’) where the petitioner's wife prayed for rejection of the petition seeking dissolution of marriage filed by the husband. 2. It is noticed that the Trial Court has rejected the application on the premise that the petition is filed in a place where the respondent's wife resided last and it is also noticed that respondent's wife is still residing in the jurisdiction of the same Court where the petition is instituted. 3. Hence the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CHS CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 62