IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85182 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2021 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== Sadanand Yadav @ Sadanand Kumar Son of Mishrilal yadav Resident of Village - Jhajura, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul, State-Bihar- 852110 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Upendra yadav Son of late Bhagwat yadav Resident of village - jhahura, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul, State-Bihar 852110. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kuldeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 6 17-03-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Shri. Rabindra Kumar. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, it is next submitted that petitioner is son of Mishrilal Yadav. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the dispute is purely civil to which a criminal colour has been given, it is next submitted that the complainant alleges that he intended to purchase a piece of land from Jamun Mandal, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85182 of 2023(6) dt.17-03-2025 2/2 but he gave Rs. 2 Lacs to the petitioner for giving it to Jamun Mandal in lieu of the land which the complainant intended to purchase, but then, no documentary evidence was executed with respect to giving Rs.2 Lacs to the petitioner. It is further submitted that Mishrilal Yadav had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 54617 of 2023 and the same was allowed by an order dated 4-7-2024. It is next submitted that petitioner being son of Mishrilal Yadav has been implicated in the instant case. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No.210C of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. SUMIT/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T