- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17237 RPFC No. 100066 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100066 OF 2025 BETWEEN: AKTHAR BASHA S/O. KHADAR BASHA, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYED, R/O. TINKER STREET, WARD NO. 25, H.NO.73, BEHIND OLD MARKET, COWL BAZAAR, BALLARI-583102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVANA GOUD T, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. JUGNU BEGUM W/O. AKTHAR BASHA, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KAVADI STREET, WARD NO.29, COWL BAZAAR, BALLARI-583102. 2. MOHAMMED ANAS S/O. AKTHAR BASHA, AGE: 7 YEARS, 3. LAIBA FATHIMA D/O. AKTHAR BASHA, AGE: 6 YEARS, THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS, REPD. BY THEIR NATURAL MOTHER SMT. JUGNU BEGUM, R/O. KAVADI STREET, WARD NO.29, COWL BAZAAR, BALLARI-583102. …RESPONDENTS THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1984, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRL.MISC.NO.72/2023, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BALLARI AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 23.12.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BALLARI, IN CRL.MISC.NO.72/2023, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER WHICH WOULD MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.12.08 10:00:42 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17237 RPFC No. 100066 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he wants more time to pay the process fee for service of notice. On the previous occasion, i.e., on 12.09.2025, the following order was passed by this Court: “Petitioner’s counsel has not filed memo for having served copy of hand summons as per order dated 20.06.2025. Process fee is also not paid. Since the petitioner’s counsel has not complied the order of this Court, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are rejected. To hear on maintainability of the petition since he has not complied the order of this Court, re-list this case on 15.10.2025.” 2. Since steps are not being taken, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE SSP CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 5