IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Appln. No.573 of 2024 Tata Capital Ltd. .. Applicant vs Noushad Ibrahim .. Respondent ORDER Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the vehicle is still to be located and therefore, the Advocate Commissioner is not in a position to re-possess the vehicle. 2.As seen from the earlier proceedings, sufficient time has been granted for locating the vehicle. Therefore, no further extension can be granted. No prejudice would be caused to the applicant if this application is disposed of by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief, once the vehicle is located. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. vga 3.Accordingly, this application is disposed of by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief, once the vehicle is located. 4.While considering the fresh application to be filed by the applicant in the near future, this Court will consider retaining the very same Commissioner appointed by this Court in this application as the applicant has already paid the Advocate Commissioner's initial remuneration of Rs.30,000/-. 18.02.2025 vga Arb.Appln. No.573 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis