MANSOOR HUSSAIN AND ORS. (LADAKH CASE) v. UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS / ROADS AND BUILDINGS)
WP(C)/1818/2025 · 2025-08-01
Sanjeev Kumar, Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8462 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8462 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.39 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1818/2025 Mansoor Hussain and Ors. …Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Gani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mehnaz Rather, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of Ladakh and Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through: Ms Shugufta Maqbool, Advocate vice Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI 1 & 2 Mr. Faizan Majeed, Advocate for 3
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 01.08.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for a while seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue his application for interim relief after the objections are filed by the other side before the Tribunal.
Statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Needless to say, upon filing of objections, the Tribunal shall be at liberty to revisit the interim directions passed in the matter, after hearing both sides.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 01.08.2025
“Mir Arif” Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 01.08.2025