IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.4676 of 2025 Decided on: 14th May, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Pushpa Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Ramesh Sharma and Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure P-8) to respondent No.3 for redressal of her grievances, however, the same has still not been 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - decided by the respondent No.3/Competent Authority. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.3/Competent Authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/ Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure P-8) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 14, 2025 R.Atal