Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8462 (BOM)

RAMESH DATTARAO PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/2265/2025 · 2025-02-18

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

36 WP NO. 2265 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2265 OF 2025 RAMESH DATTARAO PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Anilkumar B. Dhongade AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. M. K. Goyanka Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 : Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 18.02.2025 PER COURT : . The petitioner is transferred to a promotional post but aggrieved thereby being inconvenient one. 2. His representation addressed to the Chief Executive Officer, dated 11.01.2025 (Exhibit – ‘B’), has been pending. 3. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is merely interested in soliciting a direction for consideration of his representation. 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:4860-DB 36 WP NO. 2265 OF 2025 4. Learned advocate for respondent No. 3 and 4, on instructions, submits that the representation would be considered on its own merits in accordance with the policy. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation (Exhibit–‘B’) on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within three (03) weeks. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2