1 2025:CGHC:10212 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 147 of 2025  Sukhnath Ahirwar S/o Amrit Lal Ahirwar Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Lormi Near Government College, Bhatapara Tehsil/district- Mungeli (C.G.) Presently Posted As Additional Collector, Kanker C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus  Mrs. Varsha @ Rama Ahirwar W/o Sukhnath Ahirwar Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. F-2, Vishal Nagar Telibandha, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Diwesh Kumar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03. 03.2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order issued by the Deputy Secretary, General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgarh dated 06.12.2024 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Article 227 of the Constitution of India reads as under :- 227. Power of superintendence over all courts by the High Court. (1) Every High Court shall have superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the High Court may- SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.04 10:15:41 +0530 2 (a) call for returns from such courts; (b) make and issue general rules and prescribe forms for regulating the practice and proceedings of such courts; and (c) prescribe forms in which books, entries and accounts shall be kept by the officers of any such courts. (3) The High Court may also settle tables of fees to be allowed to the sheriff and all clerks and officers of such courts and to attorneys, advocates and pleaders practising therein: Provided that any rules made, forms prescribed or tables settled under clause (2) or clause (3) shall not be inconsistent with the provision of any law for the time being in force, and shall require the previous approval of the Governor. (4) Nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a High Court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has not challenged any order passed by any Court or tribunal; therefore, this petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the instant petition is hereby dismissed. 4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant