RSA-2101- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 Jaswant Singh Ravinder Singh @ Prince CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, 1. appeal against the judgment of reversal passed by the learned District Judge, Jalandhar respondents No. 1 and 2 herein ₹30,000/- 2. ordered to be issued to 22.09.2025 has been received appellant has been received back unserved with the report that ‘he has left the address’. 3. hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had brought to the notice of t Court that there was a compromise between the parties. However, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that despite his best efforts he -2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Jaswant Singh Versus Ravinder Singh @ Prince and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sahil Soi, Advocate for Mr. SP Soi, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Harkirat Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant/defendant No. 1 appeal against the judgment of reversal passed by the learned District Judge, Jalandhar, thereby partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/ respondents No. 1 and 2 herein for recovery along with interest @ 6% per annum On the last date of hearing i.e. 13.01.2025, notice was ordered to be issued to the appellant. Pursuant thereto, office report dated 22.09.2025 has been received, as per which appellant has been received back unserved with the report that ‘he has left the address’. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) reveals that on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had brought to the notice of t Court that there was a compromise between the parties. However, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that despite his best efforts he IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2101-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. SP Soi, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Harkirat Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the respondents. The appellant/defendant No. 1-Jaswant Singh, is in second appeal against the judgment of reversal passed by the learned District , thereby partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/ for recovery of damages to the tune of along with interest @ 6% per annum. On the last date of hearing i.e. 13.01.2025, notice was the appellant. Pursuant thereto, office report dated , as per which notice issued to the sole appellant has been received back unserved with the report that ‘he has left sheet(s) reveals that on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had brought to the notice of this Court that there was a compromise between the parties. However, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that despite his best efforts he Jaswant Singh, is in second appeal against the judgment of reversal passed by the learned District , thereby partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/ to the tune of On the last date of hearing i.e. 13.01.2025, notice was the appellant. Pursuant thereto, office report dated notice issued to the sole appellant has been received back unserved with the report that ‘he has left sheet(s) reveals that on the last date of his Court that there was a compromise between the parties. However, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that despite his best efforts he RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.25 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2101- is unable to establish contact with his client as such, he pleaded ‘no instructions’ in respect of the counsel for the appellant submits that upon an enquiry the notice that respondent had filed a complaint against the present appellant which was disposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, vide order dated compromise has been effected between the parties with their own free and without any coercion prays that the present appeal may be dispo 4. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, handed over in Court by learned counsel for the appellant is taken 5. counsel for the appellant which are not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents, the present second appeal is rendered infructuous application within a period of same, in case any cause of action survives 6. 24.09.2025 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- is unable to establish contact with his client as such, he pleaded ‘no instructions’ in respect of the alleged compromise. Further, learned counsel for the appellant submits that upon an enquiry the notice that respondent had filed a complaint against the present appellant which was disposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, vide order dated 14.12.2013, in view of the fact that a compromise has been effected between the parties with their own free without any coercion. Accordingly, learned counsel for the appellant prays that the present appeal may be disposed of. A copy of order dated 14.12.2016, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, handed over in Court by learned counsel for the appellant is taken on record. In view of the afore-noted submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant which are not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents, the present second appeal is infructuous, with liberty to the appellant application within a period of 02 months in case any cause of action survives in the present appeal Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable is unable to establish contact with his client as such, he pleaded ‘no alleged compromise. Further, learned counsel for the appellant submits that upon an enquiry, it has also come to the notice that respondent had filed a complaint against the present appellant which was disposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, , in view of the fact that a compromise has been effected between the parties with their own free will Accordingly, learned counsel for the appellant sed of. A copy of order dated 14.12.2016, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, handed over in Court by learned on record. noted submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant which are not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents, the present second appeal is disposed of, as having been appellant to move an appropriate 02 months from today for reviving the in the present appeal. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No is unable to establish contact with his client as such, he pleaded ‘no alleged compromise. Further, learned it has also come to the notice that respondent had filed a complaint against the present , in view of the fact that a will Accordingly, learned counsel for the appellant A copy of order dated 14.12.2016, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, handed over in Court by learned noted submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant which are not disputed by learned counsel for the as having been move an appropriate from today for reviving the RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.25 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.