Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8451 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF LOKO RAM DAS @ LOKESWAR DAS, HIS LEGAL HEIR, HAREN CHANDRA DAS AND 4 ORS. v. TANKESWAR DAS AND ANR

I.A.(Civil)/1083/2025 · 2025-09-02

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043042025 2025:GAU-AS:11910 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. :I.A.(Civil)/1083/2025 ON THE DEATH OF LOKO RAM DAS @ LOKESWAR DAS HIS LEGAL HEIR HAREN CHANDRA DAS AND 4 ORS. R/O VILL- BHATIKURUWA MOUZA- SIPAJHAR P.O.- KURUWA P.S.- SIPAJHAR DIST- DARRANG ASSAM 2.1: PRADIP DAS S/O LATE BHOGESWAR DAS R/O VILL- BHATIKURUWA MOUZA- SIPAJHAR P.O.- KURUWA P.S.- SIPAJHAR DIST- DARRANG ASSAM 2.2: KAMAL DAS S/O LATE BHOGESWAR DAS R/O VILL- BHATIKURUWA MOUZA- SIPAJHAR P.O.- KURUWA P.S.- SIPAJHAR DIST- DARRANG ASSAM 2.3: DIPAK DAS S/O LATE BHOGESWAR DAS R/O VILL- BHATIKURUWA MOUZA- SIPAJHAR P.O.- KURUWA P.S.- SIPAJHAR Page No.# 2/3 DIST- DARRANG ASSAM 3: ON THE DEATH OF NRIPEN DAS @ BABUL DAS HIS LEGAL HEIR BIPLOBJYOTI DAS R/O VILL- BHATIKURUWA MOUZA- SIPAJHAR P.O.- KURUWA P.S.- SIPAJHAR DIST- DARRANG ASSAM VERSUS TANKESWAR DAS AND ANR SON OF LATE PHULESWAR DAS R/O VILL- BHATI KURUWA P.O.- KURUWA P.S.- SIPAJHAR MOUZA- SIPAJHAR DIST- DARRANG PIN-784145 ASSAM 2:ON THE DEATH OF MRS. KAMESWARI DAS HER LEGAL HEIR BUPEN DAS SON OF LATE KAMESWARI DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BHATI KURUA P.O.- KURUA P.S.-SIPAJHAR MOUZA-SIPAJHAR DISTRICT- DARRANG PIN-784145 ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. R K BHUYAN Advocate for : MR. N M DUTTA appearing for TANKESWAR DAS AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 03-09-2025 Learned counsel Mr. A Singh is present for the applicants, who have filed Page No.# 3/3 this application under Order 22 Rule 9 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with prayer for setting aside the abatement of respondent No. 2. 2. Learned counsel Mr. N.M. Dutta is present for the respondent No. 1 and has raised no objection. 3. As the delay of 687 (Six Hundred Eighty Seven) days in preferring the application for substitution of legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 2 has been condoned, the abatement of respondent No. 2 is hereby set aside. 4. In terms of the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant