Mannu Kumar @ Abhimanyu Yadav @ Mannu Kr. @ Abhimanyu Kr. v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./86497/2024 · 2025-02-05
Chandra Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84503 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84503 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86497 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2024 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Mannu Kumar @ Abhimanyu Yadav @ Mannu Kr. @ Abhimanyu Kr. Son of Late Krishna Yadav @ Herekrishna Rawat Resident of Village- Vishunpur Mahuari, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024 dated 28.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 307, 447, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant was sitting on his door when the petitioner along with other co- accused persons having lathi, farsa and rod started abusing and the petitioner assaulted the informant with farsa upon which the informant sustained nose injury. Further the informant’s son and his mother were also assaulted by the co-accused persons. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86497 of 2024(2) dt.05-02-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is case and counter- case between both the parties. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the specific allegation of assault against the petitioner which is on vital part of the body. 6.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024, with the condition:- (i) That the petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86497 of 2024(2) dt.05-02-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled. 7. The application stands allowed. shivam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T