Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8450 (UTT)

MUNNA LAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BAC/22/2023 · 2025-09-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BAC No.22 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, AGA with Ms. Sweta Dobhal, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for respondent no.2. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant informed this Court that the criminal trial against the respondent no.2 has been concluded and resulting into his acquittal. Therefore, the Bail Cancellation Application has rendered infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the Bail Cancellation Application is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.09.2025 Ravi