Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043422025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1684/2025 TAJ MD. KAMAL KHAN AND ANR S/O - LATE ABDUL MANAN KHAN, VILL- BADARKUNA, P.O- ERALIGOOL, P.S- PATHARKANDI, DIST- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM. 2: ABDUL KASIM S/O - LATE ABDUL LATIF VILL- BANDARKUNA P.S- PATHARKANDI DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRIBHUMI (ASSAM) PIN-788710 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DISTRICT ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER KARIMGANJ/SRIBHUMI P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710 6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NILAMBAZAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK NILAMBAZAR P.S.- NILAMBAZAR SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN- 78872 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY, A S PRODHANI,S. TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, A S E C BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 26.06.2025 Heard Shri H.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri K. Konwar, the learned AAG, Assam as well as Shri R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel for the State Election Commission. The challenge in this writ petition was in respect of the action taken by the District Delimitation Commission. The petitioners are aggrieved by change of their Wards. The learned counsel for the respondents have however informed that this issue along with connected issues have already been decided by this Court in a series of writ petition, the lead case being WP(C)/5346/2024, judgment dated 24.04.2025 whereby the challenge has been rejected. On perusal of the copy of the said judgment, it appears that the issue raised in Page No.# 3/3 the present petition is squarely covered by the said judgment. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant