Ingudam Chitrasen Meitei and 14 Others v. Union of India and 3 others
MC(WP(C))/203/2025 · 2025-09-24
Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 845 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 845 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 Item No. 73 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C)) No. 203 of 2025 Ref. WP(C)No. 174 of 2025 Ingudam Chitrasen Meitei & 14 ors. …Applicant/s Vrs. Union of India & 3 ors. …Respondent/s -B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 25.09.2025 Heard Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the applicants; Mr. Kh. Samarjit, learned DSGI assisted by Mr. Nongdamba, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 ;Mr. N. Bipin, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 6 and Mr. Th. Khagemba, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5, 7 to 13 & 15 to 17. The present application has been filed with a prayer for allowing to implead the following persons as respondent Nos. 5 to 17 in the connected WP(C) No. 174 of 2025 as they are necessary party in the said writ petition :- (1) Dr. Angshuman Das, Dr. Moirangthem Dennis Singh, Dr. Ujjwal Biswas, Dr. Akash Singh, Dr. Ashwini, Dr. Sukanta Dhar, Dr. Alok Baranwal, Dr. Dinachandra, Dr. Shahnawaz Ahmed, Dr. Samiran Roy, Dr. Henam LAISHRA M DHAKES HORI DEVI Digitally signed by LAISHRAM DHAKESHORI DEVI Date: 2025.09.26 10:14:19 +05'30'
Page 2 Premananda, Dr. Ranajit Saha and Dr. Nirmalkumar Singh. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present impleadment application. Considering the submission advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the records, this Court is of the considered view that the above mentioned persons are required to be impleaded as respondent Nos. 5 to 17 as they are necessary party in the said connected writ petition. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead the names of the said newly impleaded respondent Nos. 5 to 17 in the cause title of the connected writ petition. With the aforesaid directions, the present application is disposed of. JUDGE Dhakeshori