S.M PARABAT S/O LATE MARUTI RAO v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
RP/100071/2022 · 2025-11-13
Geetha K B, S G Pandit
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84499 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84499 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15534-DB RP No. 100071 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
REVIEW PETITION NO. 100071 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
A.M. PARABAT S/O LATE MARUTI RAO SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’S
1A. SMT. SUMAN W/O ARJUN PARABAT AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. U.B. HILLI MAIN ROAD, JOGLEKAR COMPOUND, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD. 1.B. NAGRAJ S/O ARJUN PARABAT AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. SALESMAN, R/O. U.B. HILLI MAIN ROAD, JOGLEKAR COMPOUND, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD. 1.C. SMT. GANGA W/O DHARMARAJ MARATHE AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD, R/O MUNDAGOD, TQ. MUNDAGOD, DIST. KARWAR. 2. S.S. BIDARI S/O RUDRAGOUDA AGE. 75 YEARS, OCC. RETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O.RAKESHWARINAGAR, BEHIND TRAVELLERS BANGLE, 6TH CROSS, RANEBENNUR, TQ. RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI-581115. 3. S.R. MUDIGOUDAR S/O LATE RAMANAGOUDA AGE. 75 YEARS, OCC. RETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O. HOUSE NO.271/1, NEAR BELAGAVI HOSPITAL, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, UMASHANKAR NAGAR, RANEBENNUR, TQ. RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI-581115. 4. G.P. HANGI S/O PUTTAPPA
VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15534-DB RP No. 100071 of 2022
AGE. 74 YEARS, OCC. RETD,. EMPLOYEE, R/O. SHIVAVASAVESHWAR NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, YARWAD PLOT, HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI-581115. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA A. PUROHIT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES DEPT. VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES DEPT PODIUM BLOCK, V.V.TOWER, BENGALURU-01. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL IN KARNATAKA, P.B.NO 5329, PARK HOUSE ROAD, BENGALURU-01. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, PRL. GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, DSGI FOR R3)
THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 06.06.2022 PASSED IN WP NO.148524/2020 (S-KAT) AND RE-HEAR THE WRIT PETITION BY ALLOWING THIS REVIEW PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS RP COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15534-DB RP No. 100071 of 2022
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE S G PANDIT)
The petitioners are before this Court under Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC praying to review the order dated 6.6.2022 passed in WP No.148524/2020, wherein the respondents’/State’s writ petition questioning the order dated 6.11.2019 in Application No.10875-879/2019 was modified denying the monetary benefits during the delayed period. 2. The petitioners had retired from service in the year 2007, 2006 & 2015, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners. They approached the Tribunal praying for certain relief of monetary benefits in the year
2019. The Tribunal granted relief, against which, the State was before this Court in the above stated writ petition. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court under impugned order denied the monetary benefits during the delayed period. 3. Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 prescribed limitation to approach the Tribunal by any
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15534-DB RP No. 100071 of 2022
government servant. In that view of the matter, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor any ground is made out to review the order dated 6.6.2022 in WP No.148524/2020. Accordingly, the review petition stands rejected. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE
JTR LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 3