CRWP-8119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 Mahak and another State of Haryana and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respond protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 2. are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 photographs evidencing their marriag Annexure P 24.07.2025 (Annexure P 3. 4. the respondent 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 8119-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mahak and another Versus State of Haryana and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respond protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 & 5 photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated .07.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl A.G., Haryana, accepts the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, District - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8119-2025 Decided on:29.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 & 5 and their relatives. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 & 5. They & 5. Their marriage certificate and e is on record as Annexure P-3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District Yamuna Nagar ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners . They . Their marriage certificate and 3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a a Nagar VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.29 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8119 to decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. July 29, 2025 vinod* 8119-2025 to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. 9, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - 5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES 5) of the petitioners and grant them It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.29 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document