Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84464 (KAR)

SMT. ASHWINI W/O SHIVARAJ BANAKAR v. SRI. SHIVARAJ S/O MAHADEVAPPA BANAGAR

RPFC/100120/2024 · 2025-08-20

G Basavaraja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10517 RPFC No. 100120 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100120 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. ASHWINI W/O. SHIVARAJ BANAKAR AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. HOSAMATHADAVRA ONI, P.B. ROAD, TQ. RANEBENNUR, NOW RESIDING AT ASHWINI NAGAR, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, HANGAL ROAD, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KOTRESH V. HUBBALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. SHIVARAJ S/O. MAHADEVAPPA BANAGAR AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O. HOSAMATHADAVARA ONI, P.B. ROAD, TQ. RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIJAY MALALI, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE ORDER AND AWARD PASSED IN CRIMINAL MISC. NO.58/2023 DATED 10.04.2024, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HAVERI, BY ENHANCING THE MAINTENANCE TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.08.22 14:31:22 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10517 RPFC No. 100120 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the memo dated 20.08.2025 in which it is stated as under : “Herein the advocate for the petitioner most respectfully files the memo as under; The Petitioner has filed the top noted petition for enhancement of maintenance order in Crl. Misc. 58/2024 passed by Prl. Judge, Family Court, Haveri. That now the petitioner and respondent have filed the mutual consent divorce petition in M.C.No.47/2025 before the Prl. Judge, Family Court, Haveri. Accordingly, the aforesaid court has allowed the said petition and passed the judgment and decree. In view of the same, the petitioner is intending to withdraw the present petition. Wherefore, the petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the present petition as the same is not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. In view of memo of withdrawal, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE CKK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 49