Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84463 (ALL)

CHHATRAPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/17687/2025 · 2025-09-23

Abdul Shahid, Siddhartha Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17687 of 2025 Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(I) Issue a suitable order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 not to harass and threat and torture in abuse manner to the petitioner and his family members." 2. When the allegation was made that the petitioner and his family members were being harassed despite the fact that he was not named in the first information report and he had no role in the incident then the instant writ petition was filed. On 11.9.2025 the following order was passed: "1. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is the father of accused and that he had no role in the commission of offence as has been narrated in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that instead of recording the statement of the petitioner in a routine manner, the police was actually harassing the petitioner. 2. Under such circumstances, learned A.G.A. may take instructions in the matter. 3. List this case on 24.9.2025. " 3. Learned A.G.A. states that in no manner the petitioner was being harassed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner upon his personal information from the client states that the petitioner Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Chhatrapal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) and his family members were being harassed by the local police. 4. Under such circumstances, we provide that the petitioner may move an application before the respondent no. 2 Commissioner of Police, Moradabad who shall thereafter look into the matter and see to it that the petitioner is in no manner troubled. 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 M.S. Ansari CRLP No. 17687 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad