230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40169-2025 Date of decision: 02.09.2025 PRANAV PERIWAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr.R.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Pe22on for An2cipatory Bail under Sec2on 482 BNSS (438 Cr.P.C) FIR No. Dated Pending Secons 93 20.05.2025 Chhainsa, District Faridabad 316(2)/318(4) and 61(2) of BNS 1. The peoner incarcerated in the FIR caponed above has come up before this Court under Secon 482 of Bharaya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking ancipatory bail. 2. Status report by way of affidavit on behalf of the State has been handed over in the Court today and the same is taken on record. Paragraph 06 of the status report, reads as follows:- “6. That, since, the peoner/accused is not required in this case by the police, therefore, the present peon of the peoner has become infructuous and not maintainable in the present circumstances. Thus, the peon of the peoner deserves dismissal.” 3. Given above, there is no apprehension of peoner’s arrest, as such, present peon stands disposed of as infructuous with clarificaon that in case, peoner is arraigned as accused in this FIR again, he shall be given atleast 07 working days noce before arrest. All the pending applicaon(s), if any, stand disposed of. 02.09.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.09.04 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document