Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84436 (MAD)

S.BABU v. S.KARUPPAIAH

CRL RC/1810/2025 · 2025-09-23

T V Thamilselvi

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 S.Babu S/o.Santhanam, No.3/40, Veeramangala Arijana Colony Village, Pallipet Taluk, Thiruvallur District. Petitioner(s) Vs S.Karuppaiah S/o.Subramaniyam, No.482/D Jayaram Nagar, Pandiyanallur Post, Sholinghur, Ranipet District. Pin Code - 623 529. Respondent(s) CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 PRAYER To set aside the order dated 4.07.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.464 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.Nil of 2024 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Ranipet District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Parigopal 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 ORDER Challenging the impugned order dated 04.07.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.464 of 2024 in Crl.A.No. Nil of 2024 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ranipet, the petitioner had preferred this Criminal Revision Case. 2. Before the trial court, the petitioner had filed a petition under Sec.5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 327 days in filing the Criminal Appeal and the same was dismissed by the trial court stating that due to non-appearance of the petitioner, it was dismissed for default. Against which, he preferred this Criminal Revision Case. 3. The learned counsel for petitioner would submit that due to lack of communication, he is not able to appear on that day. However, the petition was dismissed for default, which was filed to condone the delay. He would submit that now he is ready to proceed with the matter and seeks one more opportunity. Accordingly, he prayed to set aside the findings of trial court and to allow this Crl.R.C. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 4. Considering his submissions and in order to give one more opportunity, this Court is inclined to allow this Criminal Revision and to set aside the findings of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ranipet rendered in Crl.M.P.No. 464 of 2024 in Crl.A. No. Nil of 2024. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed. 23-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rpp To Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ranipet. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rpp CRL RC No. 1810 of 2025 23-09-2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis