Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84432 (ALL)

SARTHAK GUPTA v. AMBRISH KANT AND 4 OTHERS

A227/8752/2025 · 2025-08-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134308 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8752 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarthak Gupta Respondent :- Ambrish Kant And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram,Rachana Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for following relief: "It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the court below i.e. IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Budaun to decide the original suit No.556 of 2014 (Ambrish Kant and another Vs. Arvind Kant and others), expeditiously as possible as within short stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble court which is pending before IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Budaun, or pass such other and further order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, during the pendency of the above noted petition; otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. From the perusal of record it is apparent that earlier also a petition being Matter under Article 227 No. 8038 of 2022 was filed by the petitioner for the same relief which was disposed of by order dated 27.09.2022. 4. In view of the Rule 7 of Chapter XXII of the Rules of the High Court Rules, 1952, second writ petition for the same relief, is not maintainable. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad