111 ANUSHKA GAUTAM STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1 submits that the petitioner intends to approach appropriate representation for present petition and the respondents be directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. 2. 3. the respondent filed by the petitioner, the same will be decided within a period of from the r case, the claim of the petitioner otherwise, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI CWP-21490 Date of Decision : 29 ANUSHKA GAUTAM VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to approach appropriate representation for redressal of present petition and the respondents be directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab ac the respondent-State and submits that in case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same will be decided within a period of from the receipt of copy of this order by passing a the claim of the petitioner is found feasible, the same will be accepted otherwise, due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 21490-2025 Date of Decision : 29-07-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to approach respondents by filing an redressal of her grievance as raised in the present petition and the respondents be directed to decide the same in a time Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of State and submits that in case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same will be decided within a period of 8 weeks by passing a speaking order and in is found feasible, the same will be accepted reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner respondents by filing an raised in the present petition and the respondents be directed to decide the same in a time cepts notice on behalf of State and submits that in case, any such representation is 8 weeks speaking order and in is found feasible, the same will be accepted reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.30 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-21490-2025 -2- petitioner, which will be conveyed to the petitioner for her information and necessary action. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the view the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty as prayed for. 5. Ordered accordingly. 29-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.30 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document