2025:HHC:30600 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No. 162 of 2022 Decided on : 08.09.2025 Sh. Rajesh Kalia …Petitioner Versus District Collector and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate, vice Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that respondent No.1 may kindly be directed to conclude the proceeding on the application U/s 118 H.P. Tenancy and Land Reform Act dated 22.06.2016, filed by the petitioner 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:30600 Titled as Vinod Kumar and another Vs. Narain Parkash Bharti pending before the Ld. District Collector Una within one Month.” 2. Without going into the merits of the issue, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in case, the proceedings are pending under Section 118 of H.P. Tenancy and Land Reform Act, before the Authority concerned, then those proceedings be concluded on or before 31.12.2025, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 08, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)