CWP-1743 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 231-A Komal State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. seeking quashing of and notice/letter dated dated 13.01.2025 Commission interview, reason being date of issuance of certificate of (BAMS) i.e. 29.07.2024 is after closing date (12.07.2024 extended up to 20.08.2024 of advertisement petitioner had submitted her provisional degree, but she has been asked to furnish original degree which she has already furnished; issuance of a direction to the respondents not to reject the candidature of the petitioner merely o 1743-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Balwinder Sangwan, Advocate for respondent No. 3-HPSC. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the instant seeking quashing of impugned notice dated and notice/letter dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure P 13.01.2025 (Annexure P-14) issued by Commission vide which the petitioner was not allowed to join the interview, reason being date of issuance of certificate of (BAMS) i.e. 29.07.2024 is after closing date (12.07.2024 extended up to 20.08.2024 of advertisement petitioner had submitted her provisional degree, but she has been asked to furnish original degree which she has already furnished; issuance of a direction to the respondents not to reject the candidature of the petitioner merely on the ground that date of registration IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1743-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Balwinder Sangwan, Advocate By way of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner is notice dated 26.12.2024 (Annexure P-9) 14.01.2025 (Annexure P-12) and public notice issued by respondent No. 3- vide which the petitioner was not allowed to join the interview, reason being date of issuance of eligibility registration certificate of (BAMS) i.e. 29.07.2024 is after closing date (12.07.2024 extended up to 20.08.2024 of advertisement and also the fact that the petitioner had submitted her provisional degree, but she has been asked to furnish original degree which she has already furnished; AND further for issuance of a direction to the respondents not to reject the candidature of n the ground that date of registration certificate of is 12) and public notice vide which the petitioner was not allowed to join the eligibility registration certificate of (BAMS) i.e. 29.07.2024 is after closing date (12.07.2024 that the petitioner had submitted her provisional degree, but she has been asked to further for issuance of a direction to the respondents not to reject the candidature of certificate of RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-1743 (BAMS) (29.07.2024) is after closing dated 12.07.2024 extended up to 20.08.2024 of advertisement her provisional degree. 2. has pointed out that 2025, the petitioner had filed an application bearing No. CM in view of consolidated judgment dated 15.02.2025 ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions being lead case No. CWP- Haryana and another consolidated judgment dated by a Division Bench of this Court vide common judgment dated 03.11.2025 passed in a bunch of Letter Patent Appeals being leading case No. LPA-13 Pardeep Kumar and others Bench dated judgment dated titled as ‘Naveen Kumar and others Etc. Commission and others Etc. 3. Court dated 03.11.2025 and of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 16.12.2025, have been appended along with connected writ petition No. CWP 2025. It is accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present writ petition. 1743-2025 -2- (BAMS) (29.07.2024) is after closing dated 12.07.2024 extended up to 20.08.2024 of advertisement; and also because the petitioner could not her provisional degree. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that in the connected petition bearing No. CWP 2025, the petitioner had filed an application bearing No. CM-5421-CWP-2025 praying for disposal of the in view of consolidated judgment dated 15.02.2025 ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions being lead case -1262-2025 titled as ‘Pardeep Kumar and others Haryana and another’. It is, however, pointed out consolidated judgment dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure A by a Division Bench of this Court vide common judgment dated 03.11.2025 passed in a bunch of Letter Patent Appeals being leading case 1397-2025 titled as ‘Haryana Public Service Commission Pardeep Kumar and others’; and the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench dated 03.11.2025, has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in SLP Naveen Kumar and others Etc. Commission and others Etc.’. Copies of judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 03.11.2025 and of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 16.12.2025, been appended along with connected writ petition No. CWP It is accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present writ (BAMS) (29.07.2024) is after closing dated 12.07.2024 extended up to and also because the petitioner could not file At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents-HPSC petition bearing No. CWP-1226- 2025, the petitioner had filed an application under Section 151 CPC 2025 praying for disposal of the said petitoin in view of consolidated judgment dated 15.02.2025 passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions being lead case Pardeep Kumar and others vs. State of , however, pointed out that the aforesaid 15.02.2025 (Annexure A-1) stood set aside by a Division Bench of this Court vide common judgment dated 03.11.2025 passed in a bunch of Letter Patent Appeals being leading case Haryana Public Service Commission vs. ’; and the aforesaid judgment of the Division been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide SLP(C) Nos. 35944-35968/2025, Naveen Kumar and others Etc. vs. Haryana Public Service Copies of judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 03.11.2025 and of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 16.12.2025, been appended along with connected writ petition No. CWP-1126- It is accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present writ (BAMS) (29.07.2024) is after closing dated 12.07.2024 extended up to file HPSC under Section 151 CPC ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions being lead case State of the aforesaid 1) stood set aside by a Division Bench of this Court vide common judgment dated 03.11.2025 passed in a bunch of Letter Patent Appeals being leading case vs. ’; and the aforesaid judgment of the Division been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide 35968/2025, Haryana Public Service Copies of judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 03.11.2025 and of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 16.12.2025, It is accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present writ RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-1743 4. the case having been called twice. 5. 6. survives in the present petition and the same is dismissed. same within a period of 04 weeks from today in case, any cause of action still survives. 7. 27.07.2026 rishu 1743-2025 -3- There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the case having been called twice. Heard. In view of the facts noted above, survives in the present petition and the same is . However, liberty is granted same within a period of 04 weeks from today in case, any cause of action still survives. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite above, it is clear that nothing survives in the present petition and the same is accordingly hereby to the petitioner to revive the same within a period of 04 weeks from today in case, any cause of action Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite nothing to the petitioner to revive the same within a period of 04 weeks from today in case, any cause of action RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.