Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84418 (PNJ)

PARVESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8127/2025 · 2025-07-29

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8127-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.07.2025 Parvesh Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Neha Bindal, Advocate for Mr. Khalid, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satbir Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present criminal writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus by directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner No.2 is married to respondent No.4 on 07.12.2008 and out of this wedlock, two children were born who are residing with respondent No.4. Now, the petitioner No.1 is living with petitioner No.2 in live in relationship but the said relationship is not acceptable to respondent No.4 and he is threatening to petitioners with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from respondent No.4 and in this regard, submitted a representation dated 20.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Satbir Goripuria, DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court Neha 2025.07.30 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8127-2025 -2- accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the State during the course of the day. Without commenting on the validity of their relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 29.07.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.07.30 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document