M/S REYAZ ENTERPRISES v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (FINANCE)
WP(C)/1755/2025 · 2025-07-28
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8441 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8441 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.01 REGULAR LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1755/2025 CM(4585/2025) M/S REYAZ ENTERPRISES … Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Shariq J. Reyaz, Advocate Vs.
UT OF J AND K AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadr, Sr. AAG with Ms Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDE R 28.07.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for a while, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to take all the grounds which he has taken before us while replying to the show cause notice. Statement of learned counsel is taken on record.
Dismissed as withdraw with liberty as prayed for.
Needless to say that whatever grounds the respondents urge in reply to the show cause, the same shall be considered and decided on merits. It needs no reiteration that once a final order is passed by the Adjudicatory Authority, the petitioner, if aggrieved, shall be entitled to raise all grounds, including that the show cause notice was actuated by malafide and was based on preconceived notions of the authority.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 28.07.2025
“ARIF” Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 28.07.2025