SAUROV BARUAH ALIAS SAURAV BARUAH v. DANDESWAR PHANGSU AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/769/2025 · 2025-08-17
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8438 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8438 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043102025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/769/2025 SAUROV BARUAH ALIAS SAURAV BARUAH S/O SURJYA BARUAH R/O 2 B LOHIT ORNATE TOWER VIP ROAD BORBARI GUWAHATI 36 KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS DANDESWAR PHANGSU AND ORS S/O BHOGMAL PHANGSU R/O MOUPUR SONAPUR PS SONAPUR KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 2:AHARI RAHANG W/O. SRI NAREN RAHANG R/O. MOUPUR SONAPUR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
3:AJAY PHANGSU S/O LATE HATIRAM PHANGSU R/O MOUPIUR SONAPUR PS. SONAPUR DISTRICT KAMRUP(M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR DEBAJIT BARMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : RFA/77/2024 SAUROV BARUAH @ SAURAV BARUAH S/O. SRI SURJYA BARUAH PERMANENT R/O. 2B LOHIT ORNATE TOWER VIP ROAD BORBARI GUWAHATI-781036 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. VERSUS DANDESWAR PHANGSU AND 2 ORS S/O. BHOGMAL PHANGSU R/O. MOUPUR SONAPUR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
2:AJAY PHANGSU S/O. LT. HATIRAM PHANGSU R/O. MOUPUR SONAPUR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
3:AHARI RAHANG W/O. SRI NAREN RAHANG R/O. MOUPUR SONAPUR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. B BARMAN Advocate for : MS M KAKOTY (R-1 TO 3) appearing for DANDESWAR PHANGSU AND 2 ORS
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 18.08.2025
Heard Mr. B. Barman, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Mr Barman has submitted that in the connected RFA No.77/2024, in the Title Page, the phrase“judgment and decree dated 24.08.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senor Division), Kamrup (Metro) at Guwahati” has been referred to. According to him, there is a typographical error, because the date of the judgment should have been
“20.08.2024” instead of “24.08.2024”. The error stands corrected. Registry shall make the correction in the Title Page of the Memo of Appeal. In the order dated 03.01.2025, the same mistake has been made. Therefore, the date appearing in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall be corrected as “20.08.2024”. Henceforth, the date “24.08.2024 appearing in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall be read as 20.08.2024”. This order shall form a part of the order dated 03.01.2025 passed in RFA/77/2024. The IA stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant