Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84341 (PNJ)

M/S S.S. CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/22425/2024 · 2025-08-18

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (104) CWP-22425-2024 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.08.2025 M/S S.S. Contractors and Engineers ...Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vibhor Bansal, Senior Panel Counsel, with Mr. Ishank Bansal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4. SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. Upon instructions, counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 states that the power to appoint the arbitrator under condition 70 of IAFW-2249 (General Conditions of Contracts) has been vested to the Chief Engineer, Headquarters, Western Command, who has to make an appointment. State counsel does not have any instructions regarding conceding to appointment of arbitrator by this Court. 2. In view of the above, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy available to the petitioner under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Pending application stands disposed of. (SUVIR SEHGAL) 18.08.2025 JUDGE Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.08.20 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment